FACT-CHECK PH
  • Home
  • Fast Facts
  • Fact-Check
  • The Fact Pattern
  • Facts by Law
No Result
View All Result
FACT-CHECK PH
  • Home
  • Fast Facts
  • Fact-Check
  • The Fact Pattern
  • Facts by Law
No Result
View All Result
FACT-CHECK PH
No Result
View All Result

What the ‘Anti-Epal’ policy really means

Fact-Check PH by Fact-Check PH
February 20, 2026
in Fast Facts
Reading Time: 2 mins read
A A
0
What the ‘Anti-Epal’ policy really means
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The long-standing practice of filling and plastering government-funded projects with the names and faces of public officials is now facing stricter enforcement under the Anti-Epal Policy, following the issuance of Memorandum Circular No. 2026-006 by the Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG).

The policy prohibits the display of any identifying symbols of public officials, such as names, photographs, logos, initials, slogans, and even color motifs, on government-funded projects, programs, activities, and properties. It applies to all local government units nationwide, including provinces, cities, municipalities, and barangays.

Under the directive, personalized tarpaulins, billboards, project markers, and signages that promote individual officials rather than the institution are no longer allowed. 

The DILG emphasized that government projects are funded by taxpayers and must remain politically neutral and free from personal branding.

While the circular mandates nationwide compliance, some local governments had already implemented similar policies years earlier. One major example is Pasig City, under Mayor Vico Sotto, where they have enforced its anti-epal ordinance since August 2022. 

Meanwhile, Naga City followed suit in November 2025 under former vice president and now Mayor Leni Robredo. 

Both cities impose penalties of up to P5,000 and imprisonment ranging from 30 days to six months for violations.

The Anti-Epal Policy is anchored in existing laws and audit rules, such as: 1) Article XI, Section 1 of the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines states that public office is a public trust, calling on officials to serve with integrity and lead modest lives, 2) Republic Act No. 6713, or the Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees, which prescribes a high standard of ethics in public service, and 3) Commission on Audit (COA) Circular No. 2013-004 classifies the display of officials’ identifying marks on government signboards as “unnecessary expenses.”

According to the DILG, the policy exists to ensure that public funds are used solely for public service and never for personal promotion. By removing personality-driven branding from government projects, the Anti-Epal Policy seeks to restore focus on institutions, accountability, and the people these projects are meant to serve.

Author

  • Fact-Check PH
    Fact-Check PH

    Fact-Check PH is an independent fact-checking initiative founded by Assortedge.

Tags: fast-facts
Previous Post

FACT CHECK: Palace Press Officer Claire Castro did not claim that receipts are not required for ‘secret funds’ of President Bongbong Marcos

Next Post

Ano ang nilalaman ng Supreme Court ruling na kumilala sa same-sex couples bilang co-owners ng ari-arian?

Related Posts

Ano ang ibig sabihin kapag idineklarang ‘hostile’ ang isang testigo?
Fast Facts

Ano ang ibig sabihin kapag idineklarang ‘hostile’ ang isang testigo?

Hindi lahat ng testigong tinatawag ng isang panig ay nauuwi sa testimonya na inaasahan nito. May mga pagkakataong ang...

by Francine Tosoc
August 28, 2026
When health care comes with a loan
Fast Facts

When health care comes with a loan

For millions of Filipinos, universal health care isn’t just about having a hospital nearby or a doctor on duty....

by Bea Allyson Alimangohan
August 14, 2026
Why did wearing a political cap at Eala’s match become controversial?
Fast Facts

Why did wearing a political cap at Eala’s match become controversial?

Atty. Arnedo Valera, an immigration lawyer based in Fairfax, Virginia, was the man seen wearing a “Sara ’28” cap...

by Francine Tosoc
August 10, 2026
Child vloggers under 15 now need a Working Child Permit
Fast Facts

Child vloggers under 15 now need a Working Child Permit

Filipino children are increasingly appearing in family vlogs, livestreams, brand promotions, and other monetized social media content. While many...

by Francine Tosoc
August 9, 2026
Next Post
Ano ang nilalaman ng Supreme Court ruling na kumilala sa same-sex couples bilang co-owners ng ari-arian?

Ano ang nilalaman ng Supreme Court ruling na kumilala sa same-sex couples bilang co-owners ng ari-arian?

Fact-Check PH

Independent fact-checking initiative committed to truth, context, and accountability.

Explore

  • About Us
  • Fact-Check
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

Connect

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • Email Us

© 2026 Fact-Check PH All rights reserved.

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy
  • Sitemap
No Result
View All Result
  • Homepage
  • Fact-Check
  • The Fact Pattern
  • Fast Facts
  • Facts by Law

© 2026 Fact-Check PH. All Rights Reserved.