FACT-CHECK PH
  • Home
  • Fast Facts
  • Fact-Check
  • The Fact Pattern
  • Facts by Law
No Result
View All Result
FACT-CHECK PH
  • Home
  • Fast Facts
  • Fact-Check
  • The Fact Pattern
  • Facts by Law
No Result
View All Result
FACT-CHECK PH
No Result
View All Result

What the ‘Anti-Epal’ policy really means

Fact-Check PH by Fact-Check PH
February 20, 2026
in Fast Facts
Reading Time: 2 mins read
A A
0
What the ‘Anti-Epal’ policy really means
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The long-standing practice of filling and plastering government-funded projects with the names and faces of public officials is now facing stricter enforcement under the Anti-Epal Policy, following the issuance of Memorandum Circular No. 2026-006 by the Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG).

The policy prohibits the display of any identifying symbols of public officials, such as names, photographs, logos, initials, slogans, and even color motifs, on government-funded projects, programs, activities, and properties. It applies to all local government units nationwide, including provinces, cities, municipalities, and barangays.

Under the directive, personalized tarpaulins, billboards, project markers, and signages that promote individual officials rather than the institution are no longer allowed. 

The DILG emphasized that government projects are funded by taxpayers and must remain politically neutral and free from personal branding.

While the circular mandates nationwide compliance, some local governments had already implemented similar policies years earlier. One major example is Pasig City, under Mayor Vico Sotto, where they have enforced its anti-epal ordinance since August 2022. 

Meanwhile, Naga City followed suit in November 2025 under former vice president and now Mayor Leni Robredo. 

Both cities impose penalties of up to P5,000 and imprisonment ranging from 30 days to six months for violations.

The Anti-Epal Policy is anchored in existing laws and audit rules, such as: 1) Article XI, Section 1 of the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines states that public office is a public trust, calling on officials to serve with integrity and lead modest lives, 2) Republic Act No. 6713, or the Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees, which prescribes a high standard of ethics in public service, and 3) Commission on Audit (COA) Circular No. 2013-004 classifies the display of officials’ identifying marks on government signboards as “unnecessary expenses.”

According to the DILG, the policy exists to ensure that public funds are used solely for public service and never for personal promotion. By removing personality-driven branding from government projects, the Anti-Epal Policy seeks to restore focus on institutions, accountability, and the people these projects are meant to serve.

Author

  • Fact-Check PH
    Fact-Check PH

    Fact-Check PH is an independent fact-checking initiative founded by Assortedge.

Tags: fast-facts
Previous Post

FACT CHECK: Palace Press Officer Claire Castro did not claim that receipts are not required for ‘secret funds’ of President Bongbong Marcos

Next Post

Ano ang nilalaman ng Supreme Court ruling na kumilala sa same-sex couples bilang co-owners ng ari-arian?

Related Posts

What is the Anti Money Laundering Council and why is it still relevant today?
Fast Facts

What is the Anti Money Laundering Council and why is it still relevant today?

The Anti Money Laundering Council (AMLC), serves as the central financial intelligence unit of the Philippines. It is tasked...

by Fact-Check PH
April 28, 2026
Proposed three-term school calendar could overhaul Philippine education 
Fast Facts

Proposed three-term school calendar could overhaul Philippine education 

The Department of Education (DepEd) officially introduced a proposal to transition the Philippine public basic education system to a...

by Fact-Check PH
March 11, 2026
The factors that led to the 1986 EDSA People Power Revolution
Fast Facts

The factors that led to the 1986 EDSA People Power Revolution

The 1986 People Power Revolution was the culmination of two decades of growing resentment against the authoritarian rule of...

by Fact-Check PH
February 25, 2026
Bakit hindi pa rin legalisado ang divorce sa Pilipinas?
Fast Facts

Bakit hindi pa rin legalisado ang divorce sa Pilipinas?

Maliban sa Vatican City, ang Pilipinas na lamang ang bansang hindi pa rin ligalisado ang divorce. Sa kabila ng...

by Fact-Check PH
February 24, 2026
Next Post
Ano ang nilalaman ng Supreme Court ruling na kumilala sa same-sex couples bilang co-owners ng ari-arian?

Ano ang nilalaman ng Supreme Court ruling na kumilala sa same-sex couples bilang co-owners ng ari-arian?

Fact-Check PH

Independent fact-checking initiative committed to truth, context, and accountability.

Explore

  • About Us
  • Fact-Check
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

Connect

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • Email Us

© 2026 Fact-Check PH All rights reserved.

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy
  • Sitemap
No Result
View All Result
  • Homepage
  • Fact-Check
  • The Fact Pattern
  • Fast Facts
  • Facts by Law

© 2026 Fact-Check PH. All Rights Reserved.